Search engines are evolving. Search is not only becoming faster, it’s becoming more predictive and conversational — more like a personal assistant.
In the old days, search engine results pages (SERPs) presented little more than a collection of 10 blue links — the results of a search over web documents. These listings typically consisted of the URL along with a “snippet” of text and perhaps some other information. Search engines became quite adept at determining and displaying relevant and readable snippets.
As search engines began to incorporate search over data into their algorithms, results pages evolved accordingly. SERPs now feature engaging displays that include knowledge panels, answers to questions, rich snippets and more. In some cases, these enhanced listings are even actionable – such as a phone number on Google, which you can click to call (via mobile or Google Hangouts).
With the shift from search-over-documents to search-over-data comes a new set of challenges for search marketers. How can we create interesting and relevant content that will both surface in SERPs and also elicit a desired action?
The solution lies in determining what kinds of questions your target audience is asking and how to supply the content for each type of question.
It is possible to address many question types (as I have mentioned in previous posts that discuss form-based, or parameterized, queries).
However, to illustrate the overarching concept of optimizing content to answer questions, this post will only delve into a few specific examples. (If there are any specific types of queries or questions you are interested in knowing about, feel free to request it as a topic for Search Engine Land in the comments below or contact me.)
Here, I will address queries that deal with contact information as well as product search queries as they relate to Google Shopping.
Google provides very clear instructions for using structured data markup to get your company’s phone number(s) included in search results.
In the examples below, you can see that Organization and ContactPoint are the two Schemas defined as a minimum requirement in order for this to occur.
In the example on the above right, you can see how extended markup is used to specify different types of business numbers, such as “technical support,” “customer service,” “bill payment” and so on. There is also a means to deal with “accessibility” here, such as specifying a separate phone number (contact point) for hearing impaired users.
Once implemented, you can test your markup for this in Google’s corporate contacts markup tester tool here.
Of course, there are other ways to provide Google with structured data about your contact information. For example, Google recently announced the introduction of “Structured Snippets,” in which relevant information is extracted from tables on a web page and displayed in search result snippets.
If you have multiple contact points, it may behoove you to place all of that information in a well-labeled web table. Below is an example of some search results that clearly leverage this implementation.
For those in the retail space, it is worth examining the kinds of queries that Google may be leveraging for Google Shopping. This now falls largely under SEM rather than SEO, since Google now requires merchants to pay to be included in results, but it is important to understand how Google is determining relevance.
Although there are many form-based queries shoppers use that are pretty easy to distinguish as product searches – examples would be “black dresses under $X.00″ and so on – we can take this a step further by looking at Google’s U.S. Patent application 20140143254, called “Category and Attribute Specifications for Product Search Queries,” which describes the queries a user may enter, and the way a search engine might determine the direct correlation between those queries (questions) and the corresponding product category.
In its application, Google uses the example of the query [50 mm ef lens]. Though the query doesn’t specify the product type, a method could be used to infer that the user wants camera lenses – and, in addition, that “the desired focal length is 50 mm and the desired mount type is Canon EF.”
By contrast, a query like [acuvue lens] also uses the ambiguous term “lens.” But, by pairing that with the other term — the brand name Acuvue – the search engine could determine that contact lenses were the appropriate category in that case.
Each product category (once mapped) would have its own SERP type with a GUI similar to a landing page. When Google is highly confident it has figured out what type of product a user is looking for, it offers options for narrowing the search in the left sidebar, similar to what you might see on an e-commerce site like Amazon.com. (However, it is provided by Google Shopping and not an e-commerce site on the web.)
This is illustrated in part in the diagram below. The diagram depicted on the left-hand side is derived from the Google patent. The image on the right-hand side is from the same query run live in Google Shopping as of November 2, 2014. The corresponding mappings are depicted in the diagram with the commonalities illustrated in point.
Looking at the details of this, one can see that the “Answer” to the “Product Query” is, in fact, the category itself (the most granular and most specific that can be determined) and the “category page displayed” as the “Answer” to the query is the one portrayed above. That page is illustrated in the above example on the right-hand side.
To put it in SEO terms, the product category generates an interim page (landing page) that covers all future questions that could be asked about that product category, with the attribute selectors (faceted search) specified on the left-hand side for further drilldown.
This explains why Google wants the product category so well and accurately specified (to the most granular definition possible in terms of its product taxonomy hierarchy) in the product feed advertisers/merchants submit.
This would imply the “answer” to any product query is, in fact, stipulated in the product feed itself (assuming the product category field is correctly mapped when submitted by a merchant).
Here are some excerpts from Google’s Merchant Support pages that shed light on how it looks upon the matter:
It is worth noting that Google updates its category taxonomy every three months. Though it still supports categories published in past taxonomies back to August 2011, it stands to reason that abiding more closely to the current taxonomy would be beneficial.
There are many other types of queries that can be asked of Google that typically take specific formats, both in terms of the query templates and the results presentation templates.
A few means of supplying structured data to Google are as follows:
Bear in mind, all of these mechanisms need to send consistent signals to the search engines in terms of both the type and quality of content you are providing.
With the shift from search-over-documents to search-over-data, when search engines provide an answer to a question or some equivalent function, they need to be able to assert their answer to a question with high confidence by leveraging high precision data internally. Ensure you can provide consistent high-precision data in as many ways as are appropriate.
The post Understanding Question/Query Answering In Search & How It Relates To Your Website appeared first on Search Engine Land.